MOKSRail
News
April-May, 2002
P. O. Box 1183, Mission, KS 66202-1183
www.trainweb.org/moksrail
Next Meeting:
Saturday, April 13
Kansas City Union Station 1:00 p.m. Luncheon meeting
The luncheon meeting will be held in Union
Cafe $5 per person meals. Meal attendance is limited to 30
people RSVP ASAP.
Meeting will be held in a private meeting
room on the mezzanine above the restaurant.
Please plan to attend this important
meeting.
It will have been nearly six months since
MOKSRail members last had a formal meeting. Since then, many
things with Amtrak and Missouris Amtrak service have
changed or may shortly change.
One of the top items on the agenda will be
determining how group members can work together and help save the
Kansas City St. Louis trains, which are being threatened
by a state funding crisis.
The meeting is timed so rail advocates
living in St. Louis and other areas of Eastern Missouri can ride
the train to Kansas City, attend the meeting and return the same
day. About a third of MOKSRails membership lives in the St.
Louis area.
EDITORS NOTE:
Most of this newsletter is dedicated to getting rail advocates
and the traveling public energized to work to save the Missouri
train service. Once the trains are discontinued, history shows us
it is always a long and difficult road to get service returned.
Witness the nearly 20 years it took rail advocates in Oklahoma to
restore Amtrak service to the most populous state that lacked
rail passenger service.
Missouri Governor Bob Holden has zeroed-out
funding for the state's four daily passenger trains, the Ann
Rutledge and Kansas City/ St. Louis Mules, which travel 283
miles, providing two daily departures from the state's largest
cities.
The state has invested in rail transportation since 1979 when
Amtrak, under financial pressure to cut routes (sound familiar?),
discontinued the important New York City- Kansas City National
Limited, which ran from through Philadelphia, Pittsburgh,
Columbus, Ohio, Dayton, Ohio, Indianapolis and St. Louis. The
train, which had a Washington D.C. section, connected with the
popular Southwest Chief, then called the Super Chief, which
runs from Chicago to Los Angeles via Kansas City and Albuquerque.
The Southwest Chief is Amtraks fastest Chicago- Los
Angeles train.
The state of Missouri pays $6 million a year to fund the two
Kansas City- St. Louis trains. If that sounds like a lot of money
to run two coach trains, then consider what the price tag is
estimated to be for reconstructing Interstate 70 from
Independence, MO., to just west of St. Louis: $3
billion.
The $6 million charge is merely .02% - or two-tenths of one
percent - of rebuilding and widening one major Interstate
highway, which will likely have to be rebuilt and undergo many
more repairs in its lifetime.
This isn't a call to end highway subsidies - which never end -
but to show how this country needs to fund a balanced
transportation system that affords its citizens the opportunity
to travel by modern passenger trains much the same as investments
made in airports and highways.
MOKSRail News
April-May, 2002
A sample letter you can customize and use in
your writings to state lawmakers is included later in this
newsletter.
We have also placed a copy of a Save the
Missouri Trains flyer, which you can copy and handout to
passengers, Amtrak employees and others along the route. This
flyer has a simple message: the trains are being threatened.
Please write your lawmakers and urge that they continue funding
this important transportation service. Note: MOKSRail
will reimburse members copying costs.
The flyer and letter can also be found on
MOKSRails updated Web site, where it can be downloaded and
copied. Information on the threat to the train service is also
prominently displayed on the MOKSRail web page, which is now
hosted, for free, by Trainweb.com.
Please take a few minutes out of your day
and write the governor and your elected state representatives and
senators. Tell them Missouri needs to continue investments in
passenger rail. Instead of cutting such service, passenger trains
should be expanded to include other cities such as Springfield,
MO., and St. Joseph, MO. There is no logical reason why the
world's leading industrialized country should have a third-world
rail transportation system.
MORE
FACTS ABOUT MISSOURI AMTRAK SERVICE
Rail travel is a valued link in the
transportation system for a large number of people, according to
a recent (1998) Missouri Department of Transportation-funded
Amtrak service study.
"The service is highly beneficial to
the state -- providing a fairly low-cost alternative that is
highly valued by a significant portion of the population. The
cost-benefit analysis finds that benefits to the
residents of the state of Missouri exceed
its public cost," the study found.
While Missouri's highways are rated third
worst in the nation, an Amtrak passenger survey found the
Missouri trains well-liked, with travelers giving it an 8.4 on a
1-10 scale.
The trains also serve a broad base of
citizens, including large number of college students and
retirees, which comprise 19% and 18%, respectively, of the its
ridership. 25% of the trains riders are professional or
managerial.
If Amtrak service were not provided, a
majority of passengers (67%) stated they would drive to their
destinations -- further crowding congested I-70 and U.S. Highway
50. Only 7% said they would take the bus; 4% would not travel.
One of every 14 rural Missouri residents
does not have automobiles; one-fourth of Missourians over 65
years of age do not have drivers licenses. Public transit
provides a lifeline for 600,000 disabled Missourians, according
to the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority and the Missouri
Public Transit Association.
For the year 2000, the last year numbers
have been released, 204,766 people rode the trains.
The cost to merely maintain
Missouri's existing road system, according to MODOT, is
$550-650 million a year -- much more than the $6 million the
state spends on Amtrak.
COMMENTS/
UPDATES ON SITUATION FROM OTHER ADVOCATES
Greetings,
I forwarded your web site to
Citizens for Modern Transit, a major transit/Amtrak advocacy
agency in St. Louis. Their lobbying in Jefferson City has
already paid benefits in getting the AMTRAK funding out of the
Rainy Day fund and into the regular budget. We're hoping that our
advocacy of AMTRAK here will result in full funding for AMTRAK.
Let's keep up the pressure on all sides.
Mike McGrath, Region IX NARP director,
St. Louis
MOKSRail News
April-May, 2002
Mike Mayor Swoboda, mayor of Kirkwood, Mo.,
in communication with MOKSRail, said,
Were working very hard at it
(saving the Amtrak service). Were doing very well in-house.
Representatives Joan
Bray, St. Louis, and John Griesheimer, Washington, Mo., are strongly behind our efforts. The bill on April 1 should do quite well within the House. The test will be in the state Senate, he said.
By Doug Ohlemeier, MOKSRail newsletter editor
EDITORS NOTE: The
following is an account of one way the writer hoped to help save
the Missouri passenger trains. Perhaps it can inspire you to take
similar action. This activity did not require a lot of time nor
money. Just a couple of hours on a weekend afternoon.
Even if the Missouri trains are
preserved, work such as this will need to be done to rally
passengers on the other Amtrak trains that serve Kansas and
Missouri, the Southwest Chief and the Texas Eagle.
I went to Kansas City's Union Station,
Independence and Lee's Summit Amtrak stations on a recent
Saturday, handing out flyers and talking with passengers, telling
them about the budget crisis may end the Amtrak service. I
received a good reception in my visits, which weren't well
planned. I took advantage of some time I had on a Saturday and
put my energy into getting people concerned about the situation.
Started at Union Station, 12:30 p.m., about a half hour before
the westbound train's arrival from St. Louis. It was 30 min.
late, so had more time to handout flyers and talk with people,
including a conductor after the train arrived. The conductor and
LSA from STL I talked with seemed supportive and took many of the
flyers.
One conductor seemed a little reluctant
about letting us place flyers on the coach seats before
departure, due to some Amtrak rule prohibiting solicitations.
However, they were very supportive of what our group is doing to
help save the MO train service.
The Amtrak agent inside the station
allowed me to tape the flyer to a bulletin board and leave plenty
on hand for people to pick-up.
At 2:00 p.m., drove cross-town to
Independence to tape flyers to the windows of the restored
station. The flyers have been taped to the inside glass (looking
outside) parts of the windows of the doors of the area that had
once been opened prior to train arrival time (by the city) for
passengers. The area is now closed, however, since the door was
vandalized. A genealogy society has the waiting room area of the
station. I talked with the individual there. He took one of my
flyers and put it on the bulletin board.
I then returned to KC Union Station about 10 minutes before the
3:05 p.m. departure for STL. The conductor allowed me to board
the train where I handed flyers to passengers and told them the
situation. I really enjoyed this part as I did not have one
person turn me down, unlike inside the station. I should have
placed flyers on the seats, but time probably would not have
allowed it. (Plus I had limited copies). The next time I do
this, I will definitely arrive early to allow for placing flyers
on the seats.
Then hit the car again and speeded to Lee's Summit, arriving
about 15 minutes before the train arrived (the 3:41 to STL). Got
to handout flyers and talk with the 7 or so passengers, plus
people taking their relatives to the train, who again seemed very
interested in saving the train. Many had not heard of the crisis,
though some had read about it in the newspaper. A number of
people were in their automobiles parked alongside the brick
platform waiting to see passengers off. I knocked on their window
and struck-up short conversations with them as well. I also taped
flyers inside the glass cubicle station.
Perhaps MOKSRail members could take the train to Jeff City or
further, and back, same day, bringing flyers and talking with
people. It might be a good idea for a number of rail advocates in
the MOKS Rail group to take such a trip together.
Send a news release to media in KC and en
route - Sedalia - Warrensburg - Lee's Summit - Independence -
Jefferson City - Hermann - Washington - all have local newspapers
- telling them that our group will be riding the train that
Sunday (or Saturday - Sundays have higher ridership - as do
Fridays) and calling attention to the fact that this train may
disappear unless the legislature acts.
MOKSRail News
April-May, 2002
We can have some members from STL area
come west - and meet in Jeff City. It may not need many people to
do this - but this might get attention, if we say the MOKS Rail
group is doing this - especially on normally slow news days like
Saturdays and Sundays.
It was a good experience striking up conversations with people
and explaining how we want to keep these trains running. Some
people, unfortunately, think you're trying to sell them
something. Some weren't interested. But most did express interest
and took a copy of the flyers.
PRO-MISSOURI TRAINS LETTERS-TO-EDITOR
Rail advocates and others are speaking-out. Their comments
have appeared in some of the states leading newspapers.
Should you see an article or other letter to an editor that is
critical or questions the need for Missouris Amtrak
service, or passenger rail in general, feel free to respond by
composing your own letter. You would be surprised at how many
letters get published and help influence public opinion.
This letter from Kevin Brubaker, Environmental Law
and Policy Center of the Midwest, appeared in the St.
Louis Post-Dispatch, Saturday, Feb. 23, 2002:
The headline read: Cutting Amtrak would have lasting
effects
While Missouri is making short-term decisions about how to
balance its state budget in times of declining revenue, it is
also making long-term decisions about its future transportation
network.
Brubaker said the governors proposal to save $6 million
this year is penny-wise but dollar foolish. Funding for
highways will continue at a rate of $1.7 billion a year.
If Amtrak service were eliminated, it would likely never
return. That means not just eliminating service now between
Kansas City and St. Louis, but forgoing high-speed rail as well.
For five years, Missouri has been working with Illinois and
seven other Midwest states to develop fast, comfortable and
convenient rail service connecting Kansas City and St. Louis with
virtually every major city in the Midwest. Illinois is already
spending more than $100 million to reduce travel times between
St. Louis and Chicago. Michigan just began running trains at 90
miles per hour - the first speed increase anywhere outside the
Northeast in more than a generation.
Missouri stands to benefit from these investments through
both its current rail service and its eventual upgrade in
frequency and speed.
Rail service won't easily return. Other areas of the
country have learned the hard way, spending years negotiating
with private railroads to get back service they once enjoyed.
Regardless of the financial challenge faced by the state,
$6 million is a small price to pay to remain vitally connected to
the region's rail network.
A letter from former MOKSRail president Wayne
Copple was published in the March 5 Kansas
City Star.
Headline: Save our trains
Copple commented on the Stars
Feb. 24 favorable page A-1 article entitled, "Stormy times
for Amtrak: Towns worry about losing trains." Copple said
the articles pie chart says it all: Amtrak and all other
rail programs got 1.2 percent of total federal transportation
funding in fiscal year 1999.
What wasn't shown is that even
this pitiful token funding is shrinking. After accounting for
inflation, Amtrak is getting about half what it received 10 years
ago.
Since its inception, Amtrak
has only been allowed to hobble along. Every few years, we
propose to remedy this by cutting off a few more inches of its
crutches -- and then profess wonder that it can't run races.
Copple said where Amtrak has been provided
the resources to make even modest improvements, the public has
responded through increased patronage.
MOKSRail News
April-May, 2002
Copple said road and air will likely remain
the predominate modes of public transport for some time, but
there is a growing awareness of the downside of our
fly/drive system and increased demand for reasonable
alternatives.
You don't always get what you pay for,
but you almost never get what you don't pay for. We've tried to
have a national rail passenger system on the cheap, and it shows.
Copple proposed that either the country
makes a serious commitment to having a first-class rail passenger
network, a truly national network comparable to our interstate
highways, or junk the whole thing and admit we have sold
out to the highway and airline lobbies.
By Doug Ohlemeier, MOKSRail newsletter
editor
Members of the Passenger Rail Oklahoma
association (PRO) recently traveled north to Wichita, Kansas to
generate Kansas support for continuing funding for The
Southwest Chief.
PRO executive director Evan Stair, of
Norman, Oklahoma, legislative director Matt Dowty, of Enid,
Oklahoma, came to Kansas to call attention to the threat of
losing the train, which also serves Oklahomans who drive to
Newton to board for points east and west.
Think of it. Two Oklahomans coming to the
Sunflower State to get Kansans fired-up about saving their only
passenger train.
Having worked with this group in the past
via email and Internet rail passenger advocacy, I represented the
MOKS Rail Passenger Coalition and agreed to help them man their
booth. The group's trip to Wichita for the two-day weekend model
railroad show March 16-17 appears successful.
The booth at the Air Capitol Train Show
operated by the volunteers from the Sooner State displayed an
organized rail passenger support group that is making inroads in
providing information about the benefits of expanded rail
service. PRO's exhibit featured pictures of Amtrak's Southwest
Chief.
Members handed out many free colorful Amtrak
carrying bags that had system timetables and 2002 travel
planners. PRO also provided a simple flyer explaining the need to
get involved and encourage people to write letters to their
congressmen and senators.
More than 125 people were persuaded to write
hand-written letters to their lawmakers. The booth featured
clipboards with writing paper and chairs to allow people to
compose simple letters. PRO provided the paper, envelopes,
postage and even a sample letter that simply read, Dear
Senator Brownback, please work to keep the Southwest Chief
running through Kansas. Free soft drinks were offered as an
enticement to get people to write.
We felt that the opportunity to raise
awareness on the issue in a Kansas, which has three lawmakers on
Amtrak jurisdictional committees, was too important to
miss, said Dowty, who skipped the Region IX NARP Fort Worth
meeting.
On behalf of Region IX NARP, Dowty held a
press conference in the waiting room of the Newton Santa
Fe-Amtrak
station. The news conference served
the purpose of letting people know that the Southwest Chief may
be cut.
Spreading the word about
the endangered Southwest Chief: From right,
Evan Stair, PRO exec. director, Doug Ohlemeier, MOKSRail, Matt
Dowty, PRO, and Brent Peterson, Amtrak Newton, Kan., station
agent laid-off in the recent station cuts
Members of Passenger Rail
Oklahoma and MOKSRail worked the booth to promote interest in
saving Amtraks Southwest Chief, which stops in Lawrence,
Topeka, Newton, Hutchinson, Dodge City and Garden City, Kansas.
The Southwest Chief is one of 18 trains Amtrak has targeted for
discontinuance if Congress does not provide the carrier funding.
MOKSRail News
April-May, 2002
The Wichita ABC and NBC television
affiliates as well as the Newton and Hutchison newspapers covered
the event. Also in attendance was a representative of
Congressman Tiahrt's office. Tiahrt, a Wichita Republican,
sits on the all-important House Transportation Appropriations
Subcommittee.
Newton Mayor H. Grant Scott did an
excellent job at the conference, Dowty said. He
was well-versed on the issue and had all the arguments down pat.
They don't want to lose their service.
Many people let us know the next day
they saw the coverage in one form or another, Dowty said.
We made hundreds of contacts at the train show. All
of us were pretty sore being on our feet all day but it was worth
it to help save the trains.
Perhaps MOKSRail members can take a page
from Oklahomas efforts. We could have booths at area events
and help rally public support for rail service in this region.
MOKS needs to have booths at similar shows
in KC and STL. The Oklahoma group received a lot of attention.
Passenger Rail Oklahoma has scheduled a Tuesday, April 16 OKLAHOMA
PASSENGER RAIL RALLY at the State Capitol, 2300 N. Lincoln
Blvd., Oklahoma City. The rally will provide passenger rail
supporters an opportunity to meet with state lawmakers and to
listen to presentations from Heartland Flyer Coalition Members.
Texas Department of Transportation representatives will discuss
Governor Rick Perry's Trans-Texas Intermodal Corridor Plan.
Let your voice be heard. Without your
help, the Heartland Flyer could end, PRO members say.
House Bill 2360 has passed the Oklahoma
State House of Representatives 95 to 0. The bill has been sent to
the Senate for action. This is however only the beginning of the
battle. Rail supporters say it is still much too early to
determine if we have the support in the Senate to save the train.
Senate President Pro Tempore Stratton
Taylor, who has blocked measures to support the train, is being
targeted in a letter writing campaign. HB 2360 would earmark
funding for Oklahoma's State Rail Maintenance fund in addition to
highways, aeronautics, public transit and waterways. The railway
maintenance fund would provide funding for the Heartland Flyer
and expanded Oklahoma Service. Oklahomas contract with
Amtrak expires in May and without his support Oklahoma will lose
Amtrak service likely forever.
For more information, please visit the
groups Web site at http://members.aol.com/sfrr5/probak.html.
Amtrak ridership grows while airlines'
decline
MORE RAIL TRAVELERS; MORE UNCERTAINTY ON THE
HILL March 15, 2002
February was the sixth straight month in
which Amtrak performed much more strongly than did the airlines
in terms of year-to-year percentage change comparisons. It also
saw Amtrak's strongest percentage increases of the fiscal year.
Amtrak ridership was 6.4% above the February
2001 level; passenger-miles rose 8.6%. The Air Transport
Association reported declines for domestic service of 12.5% and
10.3%, respectively. Amtrak's passenger revenues were up 17.0%.
Strong demand for passenger rail is truly
nationwide and is not confined to the Northeast Corridor:
On sleeping cars, ridership was up 13.1%,
passenger-miles 18.0% and ticket revenue 18.0%. For the
third consecutive month first class ridership on the Los
Angeles-Seattle Coast Starlight hit an all-time record,
increasing 10.7% compared from a year ago, while ticket revenue
was up 12.3%. Ridership on the Pacific Surfliners (San Diego-Los
Angeles-Santa Barbara) and Cascades
(Eugene-Portland-Seattle-Vancouver, B.C.) surged 9.6% and 14.2%,
respectively.
The public's post-9/11 travel patterns
continue to send a clear message about the new importance of
intercity passenger rail, but the message from Washington about
what if any such service will exist after October 1 is still
ambiguous.
At yesterday's Senate Commerce Committee
hearing on Amtrak, Chairman Hollings (D.-S.C.) noted that his
bill -- S.1991, an authorization aimed at supporting and
improving the entire system -- now has 25 co-sponsors. But John
McCain (R.-Ariz.), the committee's ranking member, again
questioned the need for passenger trains outside the Northeast
Corridor and perhaps the West Coast.
Deputy Transportation Secretary Michael
Jackson took criticism from both Hollings and McCain for the lack
of a specific Bush Administration plan for passenger rail.
Jackson said, "We need to change the behavior and the
structure that has produced [Amtrak's fiscal] problems ... We're
not prepared to commit to a specific dollar amount...The
President needs to review the significant economic costs of this
need."
MOKSRail News
April-May, 2002
AMTRAK
STATION AND TRAIN CUTS:
EDITORS NOTE: Amtrak
service on its Western long-distance trains has suffered massive
personnel, station and checked baggage cuts. The only cities on
the Southwest Chief route between Chicago and Los Angeles that
have checked baggage are Kansas City, Albuquerque and Flagstaff.
Many stations have been closed on
weekends with only one attendant working most shifts. Passengers
and large groups of travelers now have no one to help them with
luggage while boarding trains.
MOKSRail vice president John Mills wrote
this article, posted on Internet Amtrak news forums, criticizing
the National Association of Railroad Passengers for its response
to the massive station and train cuts.
To any or all of the NARP hierarchy who
helped come up with the response which appeared on the NARP
Hotline of Friday, February 22, 2002, to the matter of station
services and/or hours of operation, let me register my protest.
First of all this statement should be
withdrawn immediately for the sake of our membership roll. Longtime
members are already calling saying they will not renew their
membership. I don't blame them.
Second, the statement is passive and
non-compelling to the point of suggesting additional cuts.
The imbalance in the cuts are obvious and
regionalism quite apparent. The Southwest Business Unit took an
unreasonable hit. The state of Kansas will have no station
open seven days per week for instance. Only
five-day operation at Newton, which averages
1,000 on and offs per month is pure stupidity. People are
driving from Oklahoma City, Wichita, Salina, Ft. Riley, and many
other points from miles around to catch the trains and purchase
tickets, and now to find the station closed who knows when (with
no vacation or sick relief). This holds true at too many
other important stations and NARP should be raising hell, not
compromising.
As I have said many times, "Run the
system till the funding provided is gone, lock the doors
nationwide, park the trains and wait for the results."
Also, could NARP ask Mr. Cox how can the NE
Corridor make a profit, including operation and capital costs and
yet be 12 BILLION behind on capital as we speak?
Also, when did the separation of the NE
Corridor and the rest of the system take place? What
portion of these cuts was made up there, except at
Bear/Wilmington, DE?
I thought the railroads were notorious for
using the means they did to discourage and run off potential
passengers, but Amtrak has resurrected all those schemes and a
few new ones that even the anti-passenger scalawags could
not dream up. - John A. Mills, Topeka, Kan., NARP Region IX
director at large
NARP Letter to Amtrak board: cancel train-offs notices
By Matthew Dowty, Enid, Oklahoma, NARP
Region IX director.
National Association of Railroad Passengers
Executive Director Ross Capon has written Amtrak Board Chairman
John Robert Smith and asked him not to go ahead with plans to
post discontinuance notices on 18 long-distance trains.
There are now 29 Senators signed on to
S.1991, the proposed National Rail Defense Act. This is
effectively an Amtrak reauthorization bill.
The Senate Budget Committee released its
blue print for the FY 2003 which INCLUDES Amtrak's request for
$1.2 billion. This was after 51 unidentified Senators wrote
Chairman Kent Conrad on Amtrak's behalf. Even so, the funds must
still be approved through the regular appropriations process.
House Railroad Subcommittee Chairman Jack
Quinn (R) New York has announced he is working with
Representative Bob Clement (D) Tennessee to
produce a House version of an Amtrak reauthorization to be
completed in early April.
Comment from another writer:
The letter did indeed do go to John Robert
Smith, chairman of the Amtrak board. It was pointed out
that the intended "message" to Congress had been sent
and that posting these notices would only do harm to the
summertime long-haul business. We'll all have to work
to get more Senators to sign on to S. 1991.
MOKSRail News
April-May, 2002
EDITORS NOTE:
This NARP meeting is in another region. However, since Omaha
is a three-hour drive from Kansas City, some rail advocates may
be interested in attending the meeting. It would also be a good
opportunity for Missouri and Kansas advocates to meet and
interact with our neighboring advocates to the north.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RAILROAD PASSENGERS Region 10 Meeting - Omaha
Best Western Redick Plaza Hotel,15th &
Harney, downtown Omaha. 1-888-342-5339
The NARP Region 10 annual membership meeting
will be held on April 6 at Omaha, Nebr., running from 9:30 a.m.
to 2:30 or 3 p.m.
ProRail Nebraska, an independent state
affiliate of NARP, will host the meeting, which draws attendees
from Iowa and Colorado. (South Dakota and Utah are also included
in Region 10), but to date have not attended this regional
meeting.
Dan Lutz, PRN president, extends an
invitation to MOKSRail members to attend this meeting, as we have
common interests and issues across state lines that do not
necessarily hew to the boundaries of Region 10.
Speakers so far for the meeting are Alan
Yorker, president of NARP; and Brian Rosenwald, representing
Amtrak Intercity, Chicago. Rosenwald spoke at the Region 10
meeting in Iowa last year, and does an excellent job.
His appearance is extremely timely, given
the threat to long distance passenger trains. State reports will
be given by Iowa, Nebraska and Colorado.
We usually plan an extracurricular activity
(optional) after the close of the regular meeting, including a
tour of the currently vacant former Burlington Depot in downtown
Omaha, a visit to Durham Western Heritage Museum (former Union
Pacific passenger station currently including full-size railcars,
several model layouts, and the Union Pacific Museum collection),
and the RailsWest Museum across the river in Council Bluffs,
housed in a former Rock Island depot, with some rolling stock on
display.
Scheduled guest speakers:
Alan Yorker, President, NARP
Brian Rosenwald, representing Amtrak
Intercity, Chicago
Lunch is included (choice of chicken
sandwich, pork chop, or marinated steak)
Registration is $15.00 per person, payable
by April 4.
To register please contact ProRail Nebraska
Secretary Eugene Nick
e-mail: enick@unlnotes.unl.edu
mail:
1960 Prospect St., Lincoln, NE 68502
For more information please contact ProRail
Nebraska President Dan Lutz:
e-mail: dlutz@unlserve.unl.edu
fax:
402-472-0025, Attn: Dan Lutz
mail:
3915 Apple St., Lincoln, NE 68503
NEEDED
for MOKSRail:
MOKSRail needs a logo to use on its new Web
site, newsletters and other promotional materials.
If you have graphic arts experience and can
design a simple, non-elaborate logo, please contact the
newsletter and Web site editor at ohlemeier@netzero.net or
785-865-0035. The logo can be a simple outline of the states of
Kansas and Mo. with the MOKSRail name over the state backgrounds.
A passenger train image inside the logo or in the background
would be nice. Thanks for your assistance.
MOKSRail News
April-May, 2002
Southeast
Colorado passenger rail supporters are involved in a campaign to
save the Southwest Chief. The Trinidad-Las Animas County (CO)
Chamber of Commerce has started a letter writing campaign to
lobby members of Congress to provide the necessary funds to keep
the Southwest Chief running, according to a March 25, 2002,
article in the Pueblo Chieftain.
Chamber members
began the effort after Colorado Association of Railroad Passenger
President Jon Esty told them at a meeting last month that it was
up to them to save the train.
The article,
datelined Trinidad, states if Amtrak's Southwest Chief route that
passes through Trinidad, La
Junta, Las
Animas, Lamar and Raton, N.M., is going to be preserved, the
small towns along that route will
Have to put
pressure on Congress to come up with the necessary funding to
sustain it.
Jon Esty,
president of the Colorado Rail Passenger Association since 1995
and a member of the National Association of Railroad Passengers
was quoted in the article as saying he thinks it is the small
towns and cities of America that are going to keep long-distance
passenger rail going. Esty spoke at a late March monthly
Trinidad-Las
Animas County Chamber of Commerce luncheon.
"It is you
folks who really want the (transportation) alternative," he
said.
Esty said there
isnt much concern in Denver where the citys
International Airport that allows people to travel practically
anywhere.
"The
invitation to speak here has fired me up to start talking to some
of the chambers of commerce in Grand Junction, Granby, Fort
Morgan and La Junta to get the kind of support I know you folks
are giving to Amtrak and long-distance passenger rail," he
said.
The chamber is
doing its part to try and save Amtrak's southwestern route by
urging its membership to write Colorado's elected officials in
Congress and at the State House. The letter-writing campaign that
started Feb. 19 has produced responses so far from Gov. Bill
Owens, state Sen. Lewis Entz and state Rep. Ken Kester, and
encouraging replies from officials in La Junta, Fowler, Lamar and
Raton, the article reported.
READER REACTION:
EDITORS NOTE:
In the February edition of MOKSRail News,
president David Riddle wrote an article on how the whole town of
LaPlata, Missouri (population 1,401), turned out to a December
2001 open house to celebrate the completion of interior
restoration of the citys renovated art deco Amtrak station.
LaPlata, located 14 miles south of Truman
State University in Kirksville, Missouri, is the only other
Southwest Chief Missouri stop outside of Kansas City.
David,
What a great surprise to see our Open House
on the first page of your newsletter. I also appreciated
the several pages of information. I have used it many times
and copied it for our board.
It was very helpful in talking with people
about the problem with funding on the state and national level.
We are currently working with BNSF and the
Missouri Historic Preservation Office in getting the depot on the
National Register of Historic Places.
Thanks again for sending the newsletter.
Ann Bullock, President of the Friends for
LaPlata Preservation
MOKSRail News
April-May, 2002
Sample
letter you can write to your Missouri lawmakers:
The
Honorable _______________________ Missouri
State (House of Representatives/Senate) State
Capitol Room _______ Jefferson
City, MO 65101 Dear
(Representative/Senator) ____________________: Please
support continued funding of Missouri's Amtrak service. I
live in the Kansas City area and find the trains provide
a comfortable travel alternative. Rail
travel is a valued link in the transportation system for
a large number of people, according to a recent
MODOT-funded train service study. The study said
"the service is highly beneficial to the state -
providing a fairly low-cost alternative highly valued by
a significant portion of the population. The
cost-benefit analysis finds that benefits to the
residents of the state of Missouri exceed its public
cost." Without
the train, the study found, most passengers (67%) would
drive- further crowding congested I-70 and U.S. Highway
50. If you don't think this is important, consider how
Missouri's highways are rated the nation's third worst.
Rebuilding and widening Interstate 70 alone is projected
to cost $3 billion. That could run the $6
million a year trains - a mere two-tenths of one percent
of the I-70 project - for 500 years. The
trains also serve a large number of college students and
retirees, which comprise 19% and 18%, respectively, of
the its ridership. Ending
service would also harm prospects of bringing high-speed
rail to Missouri. For five years, Missouri has been
working with Illinois and seven other Midwest states to
develop fast, comfortable and convenient rail service
connecting Kansas City and St. Louis with most major
Midwestern cities. Missouri stands to benefit from these
investments through both its current rail service and its
eventual upgrade in frequency and speed. The
events of September 11 show that America needs a strong
national train system. Short-term financial decisions
would cause long-term setbacks to the states
transportation system. I
ride Amtrak frequently and would travel by train more if
service were offered to Springfield and other areas of
the state. Indeed, the MODOT-funded study concluded that
for the Kansas City - St. Louis rail corridor to succeed,
the State of Missouri must commit to ensuring its
success. This is something the state has appeared
unwilling to do. Like
others, I want a balanced transportation system that
provides alternatives to the traveling public. Please
support continued Amtrak funding and provide Missourians
who dont want to face the congested highways and
crowded airports a transportation alternative. Sincerely, YOUR
NAME An
electronic version of this sample letter is available for
downloading at the MOKSRail Web site, www.trainweb.org/moksrail. ___________________ |
Missouri-Kansas
Rail Passenger Coalition
www.trainweb.org/moksrail
Box
1183, Mission, Kan. 66202