TESTIMONY
By Jim
Cameron,
Before the
House Committee on Transportation
RE:���������� HB 6671����� Implementing the Recommendations of the
����������������� Transportation�������������������������������
My
name is Jim Cameron and I am a resident of
I
speak today in only partial support of House Bill 6671.
I
salute the TIAs and the TSB for all their hard work in developing a long term
strategy to solve this state�s transportation crisis.� But a strategy is not a laundry list of
projects and therein lies my concern with Bill 6671
which lacks the long term vision and strategy so eloquently stated by the TSB.
Let
me focus on one example:� the long-term
growth of commuter rail.
Even
the TSB fell far short of the suggestions of the Coastal Corridor TIA�s number
one suggestion:� ordering more rail cars
for Metro-North now!� The TSB called for,
and Bill 6671 recommends, just 12 new locomotives and 40 coaches for use on
Metro-North. And if you read the TSB report closely, you�ll see that these proposed
trains are of a design that cannot run into Grand Central Terminal in NYC.� Does that make any sense?
Bill
6671 falls far short of even what the Connecticut DOT estimates we will need�� not a few dozen new
cars, but �400 to 500 new cars by the
year 2030.
Our
current train fleet is literally falling apart.�
The cars are 30 years into a 25-year life expectancy.� At last week�s Commuter Council meeting, we
were told that 69 of our 343 rail cars were in the shop for repairs that day�
more than 20% of the fleet.� ConnDOT�s
inadequate and antiquated shops are running 24 x 7 trying to keep the fleet in
operation.
The
CDOT rehabilitation plan for the oldest rail cars is underway but it is so
small as to be irrelevant� rehabilitating only four cars a month.� At that rate it will take five years to
revitalize the oldest 242 of the cars.
When
cars are out of service either for rehab work or because they�re in the repair shop,
trains are �shorted�, meaning even fewer seats for commuters.� In morning rush hour most trains are standing
room only from
Higher
fares, broken-down rail cars, inadequate parking at the stations, lack of
inter-modal transport from stations to work and insufficient seats for all
passengers� all of these are discouraging ridership.� Given plenty of attractive alternatives for
housing and good schools in the NY suburbs, what breadwinner wants to put up
with these hassles for a daily commute?�
They�ll move and take their tax dollars with them, and the entire state
will suffer as a result.
It�s
been two and a half years since the Transportation Summit.� In that time, rail commutation has become
worse, not better.� That trend will
continue. �Even if you were to act today
and approve the order of new rail cars, the CDOT bureaucracy and the limited
number of manufacturers would take three or four years to deliver those cars
for service.
In
1983, the years of neglect of our crucial transportation infrastructure bore
bitter fruit in the collapse of the
House
Bill 6671 isn�t enough.� It�s a Doctor
putting a band-aid on a gaping wound and telling the patient not to worry.� I urge you to rethink your plans and order
more rail cars now.
Thank
you.