|
Transit Corridors on Major
Streets Is Not a Good Idea
Reports in the local media and from CATS indicate
most of the consideration for locating light rail or busway corridors
seems to be centered around placing them in or alongside major city thoroughfares.
For example, the Southeast/Matthews Corridor is now focusing on running
a busway or light rail directly upon either Independence Boulevard or
Monroe Road.
The problem with directing all our attention on building
these transit corridors on city streets is that it ignores the opportunities
that using existing rail corridors offers. We are not making this mistake
along the South Corridor where we are taking full advantage of incorporating
the existing rail corridor into a new light rail line from uptown all
the way to Pineville. Why are we now talking about doing just the opposite
on three of the remaining corridors?
For example, the 200 foot wide CSX/Duke Energy right-of-way
south of Pecan Street parallels most of the proposed Southeast Corridor,
and in most places is wider than the right-of-way now in the planning
stages for the South Corridor. Yet it has been consistently ignored by
our transit planners for a variety of reasons, none of which has convinced
CEMT are completely sound. Utilizing these rail corridors could not only
cut the cost of building our new rapid transit lines, it could speed up
their construction. Rebuilding busy city streets will be extremely expensive
and will disrupt traffic and the businesses and homes that are adjacent
to those thoroughfares for many months and probably years. Operating transit
vehicles such as light rail trains on these streets may cause them to
run slower than would be the case if they were operated on private right-of-way.
There is another side to the story however that CEMT would
be unfair not to mention. Urban planners and developers like the idea
of putting transit lines on the street from the standpoint of urban development
or redevelopment opportunities. We need to be careful in putting too much
emphasis on rapid transit as the sole tool of redevelopment. CATS should
not be expected to make this kind of investment before detailed plans
and firm investment in these urban communities has been put in place.
Transit can not be expected to do it alone!
Let’s not turn our back on the idea of utilizing existing
rail corridors for future light rail. Many cities that have already built
light rail would have given anything to have had these rail corridors
available. Unfortunately most of them were not so lucky and therefore
spent far more building their systems. The South Corridor should be
our example for future Charlotte transit corridors.
|